One would have expected Flushing councilmember John Liu and assemblywoman Ellen Young to have helped stop the violence in Flushing, but they instead refused to condemn the violence, instead standing on the side of the mobsters who had assaulted the human rights activists.

Given that these two politicians, John Liu and Ellen Young, are supporting the mobsters organized by the Communist regime, I hope that John Liu and Ellen Young get impeached from their positions for allowing the Chinese Communist Party to bring their Communist influence to New York.

Probably the most anticipated feature of the new iPhone devices is their support for Microsoft Exchange ActiveSync, which allows iPhone users to synchronize emails, contacts and calendars with Exchange Server.

Apple also announced the iPhone Software Development Kit (SDK). This feature, eagerly awaited by software developers and end users, allows custom software to be developed and used by the iPhone.

From the opening credits (and the opening bars of the Ferrell-sung, ‘Love Me Sexy’ onwards), you know that Semi-Pro isn’t going to be the film to halt that run.

Ferrell is once again on fine form, bringing yet another lovable man-child to life in a way that only he can (will his shtick ever get dull?). He is, of course, ably backed up by an entourage of talented supporting players, the stand-outs this time being Andrew Daly ( School for Scoundrels ) as Dick Pepperfield and Will Arnett (TV’s immortal comedy Arrested Development ) as Lou Redwood.

Overall, the article gives it a ranking of 4 out of 5.

Some members of the notoriously cutthroat British press are up in arms about not knowing Harry was bearing arms in service of the realm. “The people have a right to know,” they scream, which perhaps is best translated as, “We didn’t get an exclusive, we didn’t get a scoop! We didn’t make a lot of money off of this!”

But certain media vultures, more interested in the impact of the story on their own reputations than upon the subject of the story, are angry that they didn’t get to wring every penny out of this story.

The people have a right to know? Don’t they also have a right to live? Doesn’t Prince Harry have the right to serve his country without the press increasing his personal peril? Don’t the soldiers stationed alongside Prince Harry have a right to the same? Do these protesting media outlets care about Prince Harry, or those other soldiers, as anything except news hooks?

Georgia congressman John Lewis said that he made the move to reflect the “will of the people.” In a statement issued by Mr. Lewis on Wednesday, he said, “As a U.S. representative, it is my role not to try to subdue or suppress the will of the people, but to help it prosper and grow.”

Lewis called his decision “difficult,” but added that the people’s enthusiasm was something he had “not seen in a long time, since the candidacy of Robert Kennedy.”

“”It certainly did not dissuade us from coming,” said Ron Sablosky, a banker and executive vice president of Outsourcing Solutions. “I don’t think it should dissuade anyone, because it really is highly unfair. And it might even be construed as unethical.”

Charles Liu, who works at the New York Freedom Times , called the story “terribly one-sided.”

Penny Cohn, an account executive and building manager, had read The New York Times article and noted, “In fact, it piqued my curiosity.”

“And not only that, it had a lot of space, too. I was quite intrigued with the amount of space it was given, I have to confess that.”

The article is about a highly biased and discriminatory article that the New York Times ran about the Chinese New Year Splendor show that took place in Radio City Music Hall. Unfortunately for the Chinese Communists, the Splendor ran to packed audiences after the New York Times article came out.

As it turns out, the Times sent more than one reporter. While the author sat watching the show, apparently another reporter (perhaps more than one) was stationed in either the lobby or outside the theater, ready to chase down and question any patrons who might happen to leave the show early. As a professional actor who has worked in theater for the past 19 years, this is an unheard-of undertaking.

The Times article went on to claim, “At intermission, dozens of people, perhaps a few hundred, were leaving.” In response to this wild discrepancy in numbers, numerous Epoch Times reporters who were in attendance to record audience reactions commented that “a few hundred” was a gross exaggeration.

In another bizarre twist, the Times article attempted to draw a myopic comparison between this simple grassroots appeal by individuals gathered on the streets and the world-class artists in the grand, lush Splendor, which presented a wide array of acts drawn from China’s vast and profound culture.

The article went on to question why Falun Gong was not mentioned in the advertising for the show. To this, NTDTV spokesperson, Carrie Hung said, “There’s such a wide variety of China’s cultures presented on stage. The Falun Gong related content is a small portion of the show, so why would we single that out?

“The Times reporter seems to suggest the need to single out Falun Gong in the advertising as some kind of warning label. Many of our audience responses singled out the Falun Gong portions as their favorites. This unwarranted stigmatizing of a group is something we would view as prejudiced, discriminatory, and unethical.”

Interestingly enough, the Splendor played to packed houses in Radio City after the overly critical and unabashedly Communist Party supportive article. Of course, the Chinese Communists used the New York Times article and published it almost verbatim in their propaganda arm, Xinhua.

Here is the first of much feedback from the audience that completely refutes the New York Times:

Banker Calls New York Times Article about ‘Splendor’ ‘Highly Unfair’

Ron Sablosky read the NY Times article about the Chinese New Year Splendor before attending the show at Radio City on Thursday.

“It was not fair at all,” he said. “But, understand, there’s a lot of times they do things that are unfair, so this not the first. And if one understands that, then one doesn’t worry very much [about] what they say.”

Apparently the negative press kept few people away from Radio City, because the show continues to play to a packed, enthusiastic house.

Sablosky was one who was not deterred by the NY Times article. “It certainly did not dissuade us from coming, and I don’t think it should dissuade anyone, because it really is highly unfair. And it might even be construed as unethical.”

Sablosky, a banker and an executive vice president of Business Outsourcing Solutions, is also trained in law. He saw the show with Mary Ann Oklesson, who works in publishing.

Both Sapolsky and Oklesson had high praise for the show.

Yes, I can’t believe it either. (OK, I admit, I live in New York, and am a little biased.)

Excellent article on the win, especially about how Manning won the game for them:

With one minute to go, Manning made an amazing escape form the onrushing Patriots defenders, and slung a soaring pass downfield, hitting David Tyree on the Patriots’ 24-yard line. Manning was sacked on the next play, and the Giants were forced to burn a timeout.